Ron, > Currently, there is no consensus that IPv6 allows insertion of extension > headers by intermediate nodes, even if those intermediate nodes are segment > endpoints . Given this lack of consensus, the authors of network programming > have wisely agreed to remove header insertion from the draft. > > Likewise, there is no consensus that IPv6 allows removal of extension headers > by intermediate nodes, even if those intermediate nodes are segment > endpoints. Why, then, have the authors of network programming not agreed to > remove PSP from the draft?
With regards to working group process; may I gently remind you that it is the chairs that call consensus. Best regards, Ole _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
