Dear Mr Moonesamy,
I am convinced there is no conflict of interest.
Since he has been WG Chair Bruno has demonstrated exemplary behaviour,
on top of being a recognized expert in his field.
Regarding the errata, "not processed" would have been more accurate than
"not accepted" but I am sure this is what Bruno meant.
Best regards,
Martin Vigoureux
Le 2020-02-28 à 23:02, S Moonesamy a écrit :
Dear Mr Vigoureux,
I am contacting you as you are listed as the Responsible Area Director
for the SPRING Working Group [1]. I would like to thank the Working
Group for providing some information [2] about the status of the Working
Group Last Call.
I was a bit surprised to see that one of the Working Group Chairs is
listed as a contributor in
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-10. It is quite unusual to
have the contributor of a Working Group document handle the Working
Group process for the document. Would there be a potential conflict of
interest?
The summary provides by the Working Group Chair states that the
Responsible Area Director "has not accepted the related errata". I took
a quick look at erratum eid5933; it is listed as "Reported". As the
erratum has not been classified as per the relevant IESG Statement,
describing it as "not accepted" is inaccurate.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
1. https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/spring/about/
2.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/or8086G4iYfee5_Icw4PnhkPLBo/
3. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5933
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
