Zafar Ali (zali) wrote on 15/05/2020 13:53:
It is clear to all that the current draft and adoption request is an attempt to circumvent the standard practice.

Zafar,

Speaking as an unaffiliated operator who runs kit from plenty of vendors, CRH looks interesting from a technical point of view.

Juniper seems to be claiming running code, so it would be a more productive use of working group time if we concentrated on rough consensus on the technical merits rather than getting side-tracked with procedural distractions.

Nick

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to