John,
On 29/05/2020 16:12, John Scudder wrote:
[long list of individual email addresses trimmed from cc, mailing lists
left]
Peter,
On May 29, 2020, at 5:11 AM, Peter Psenak
<ppsenak=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org
<mailto:ppsenak=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
if CRH-SIDs are of local significance how is the loose source routing
going to be supported?
By having the locally-significant CRH identifier (I’ve lost track of the
nom du jour :-) map in the CRH-FIB to a remote address (“segment
endpoint”), toward which the packet is forwarded along the least-cost
path. This is explicit in section 4:
o Forward the packet to the next-hop along the least-cost path to
the next segment endpoint.
how do nodes in the network learn about the local CRH identifier a node
X allocated for a prefix residing on node Y?
thanks,
Peter
Regards,
—John
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
