Very much with Dhruv here.
While the work is important and should be progressing, overall quality could be 
significantly improved.
Please use draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang as the example.

Regards,
Jeff

> On Jul 25, 2020, at 10:22, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi WG,
> 
> I support the adoption of this work and I have thoughts on how to
> improve the document -
> 
> Some questions/comments -
> - Can the title of the I-D be improved?
> - Why do you have the config and the state trees separately in Figures
> 1 and 2? That's out of fashion with NMDA!
> - I hope this model is applicable for both the headend router as well
> as for the controller. If yes, we should highlight that as well as
> make sure the YANG model takes care of this. For example, counters,
> forwarding, etc
> - The node-capabilities are marked as read-only, but an operator may
> want to disable or enable these right?
> 
> Suggestions for improving YANG -
> - Update copyright year
> - path-attrs-cmn is described as "Path properties -common for v4/v6",
> in that case, is this the right yang model for it? and should it be in
> the generic SR model instead?
> - Typedef for algorithm could be useful, it is unit32 here but uint8
> in draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang
> - What is the purpose of the empty containers end, end_psp, end_usp,
> end_psp_usp, end_usd, end_psp_usd, end_usp_usd, end_psp_usp_usd? Are
> they placeholders for something?
> - Run this "pyang -f yang --keep-comments --yang-line-length 69
> <FILE>" to help you with formatting the yang model.
> 
> Thanks!
> Dhruv
> 
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 3:22 AM James Guichard
>> <james.n.guich...@futurewei.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear WG:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> This email begins a 2 week WG adoption call for 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-raza-spring-srv6-yang/ ending Monday 
>> 27th July 2020.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Please speak up if you support or oppose adopting this document into the WG. 
>> Please also provide comments/reasons for that support (or lack thereof). 
>> Silence will not be considered consent.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Jim, Joel & Bruno
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> spring mailing list
>> spring@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to