Hi, Not sure if you are aware, there was a BoF proposed on using an identifier to signal user requirements (APN) in a slice, APN BoF. It was decided it would be better to first have it further discussed at IETF110's RTGWG as it would allow for a broader coverage: https://www.ietf.org/blog/ietf110-bofs/
Considering the current discussion in spring and the work already on-going in teas on IDs and "what is a slice", and to help focus the discussion at the meeting, I wanted to bring the following drafts to your attention. I have asked the authors to help us understand the gaps with the on-going work not being addressed and what new work is needed. The authors have done a lot of work, this is just a selection: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-peng-apn-scope-gap-analysis-00.txt https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-li-apn-framework-01.txt https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-li-apn-problem-statement-usecases-01.txt If you search documents on APN, you will find more. Happy reading, Deborah
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
