Hi Greg,

Please see inline.

From: Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 2:38 AM
To: Bruno Decraene <bruno.decra...@orange.com>
Cc: spring@ietf.org; draft-ietf-spring-nsh...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Last Call draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr

Dear All,
I have several questions about the draft:

  *   When using the approach described in Section 4, i.e., SR-based SFC with 
the integrated NSH, how does a re-Classifier scenario be handled? If I 
understand it correctly, a re-Classifier can change the SPI of the NSH coming 
back from the SF. If that is the case, the SFF will not match it to the saved 
SR information because the SPI had changed. How would SFF forward the NSH and 
the payload?
Jim> A reclassification both in service chaining and segment routing means that 
the original path is replaced by a new path. In this case a new SPI would 
forward the packet based upon the SFF lookup just like any other service chain; 
the original path would be replaced and the network programmed to support that 
new path based upon the policy action. Of course the network operator would 
need to program this in such a way that if necessary the original SR path (or 
parts thereof) are integrated into the new path.

  *   Related to the scenario from the above. The stored SR information that is 
not being used appears to become stale. It seems that it creates a leak of 
resources in a system that should be controlled somehow.
Jim> yes you are right Greg and we probably need to add some text to support 
the caching operation which was also suggested by Dhruv in another email. If 
you have any suggested text that would be great but I will also look into it.
Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:31 AM 
<bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>> wrote:
Dear WG,

This message starts a 2 weeks WG last call for draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr [1].
After review of the document please indicate whether you believe this document 
should be progressed to the IESG.

In addition to yes/no, please consider providing a technical review of this 
document; in particular if you care for this document.
Indeed, since WG adoption, this document had benefited from little reviews from 
the WG, so we need more review from the SPRING WG.

If you are aware of an implementation of this document, please report the 
implementation either on the list or to the chairs so that the shepherd can 
report implementations in the writeup.

Note that I'll forward that call to the SFC WG.

Thanks!

[1] 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr&data=04%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Ccb89827bcbdd4742350d08d8d3170a49%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637491443219237530%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=qLw6TUw0pZgid1ez%2BKh3BSmBoAHEf6I3yX7tu5Q3ULk%3D&reserved=0>

--Bruno


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fspring&data=04%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Ccb89827bcbdd4742350d08d8d3170a49%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637491443219237530%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=lgC3kKUaNsnSEOZwKvXcrrbuc3pxLJyjO93STGddcJU%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to