> Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for > compressing SRv6 information?
Yes. This is data plane and any "flexibility" of more then one solution in data plane would only bring pain to everyone. Thx, R. On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 8:52 PM Joel M. Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts > on the requirements and analysis drafts. The question of how the > working group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic > for a separate email a bit later. > > Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and > the perspectives being expressed. While the topic was well-raised, the > discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to > everyone what the purpose is. In particular, the chairs have decided to > re-ask the question. We ask that even those who have responded in the > discussion respond to this thread. Preferably with both what their > opinion is and an explanation of why. > > The question we are asking you to comment on is: > > Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for > compressing SRv6 information? > > Please speak up. We are looking to collect responses until close of > business PDT on 20-August-2021. > > Thank you, > Joel, Jim, and Bruno > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
