I support to have only one data plane compressing solution. Having more than one behaviors standardized means that vendors will need to support all the solutions, and before that happens there will be interoperability issues, essentially zero solution.
Thanks, Yingzhen > On Aug 4, 2021, at 11:52 AM, Joel M. Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > > The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts on > the requirements and analysis drafts. The question of how the working group > wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic for a separate > email a bit later. > > Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and the > perspectives being expressed. While the topic was well-raised, the > discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to > everyone what the purpose is. In particular, the chairs have decided to > re-ask the question. We ask that even those who have responded in the > discussion respond to this thread. Preferably with both what their opinion > is and an explanation of why. > > The question we are asking you to comment on is: > > Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for compressing > SRv6 information? > > Please speak up. We are looking to collect responses until close of business > PDT on 20-August-2021. > > Thank you, > Joel, Jim, and Bruno > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
