Hi Everyone,

    I support the adoption of the two documents.

Best Regards,
Huaimo
________________________________
From: spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of bruno.decra...@orange.com 
<bruno.decra...@orange.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 9:12 AM
To: spring@ietf.org <spring@ietf.org>
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption call - 
draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement - 
draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis


Dear WG,





The Design Team has produced two documents:

- A requirement document: draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement

- A solution analysis document: draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis



Both have been presented to the WG and triggered some discussions but are still 
individual documents.

We believe it's now time for the WG to consider taking ownership of those two 
documents.

Note that, especially for those two documents, WG adoption does not necessarily 
mean RFC publication in particular if it turns out that the benefit of long 
term archive would not justify the WG and IESG effort to finalize those two 
documents.





This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call, ending September  20th 2021, for:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement&data=04%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7Cd5c7a504a0874e95f4f408d972013501%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637666171875325111%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=UewjLKgh6%2Fb8p2J%2Ba2PSVIwXp4DGaQW3SbXev4KEopA%3D&reserved=0>

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis&data=04%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7Cd5c7a504a0874e95f4f408d972013501%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637666171875335069%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=3QCbxZLIh4pwjOGWOjDq6Wm%2FSVommgr3%2BU1AYeyySd0%3D&reserved=0>





After review of the document(s) please indicate support (or not) for WG 
adoption of the document(s) to the mailing list.

Please also provide comments/reasons for your support (or lack thereof) as this 
is a stronger way to indicate your (non) support as this is not a vote.



If you are willing to work on the document(s), please state this explicitly. 
This gives the chairs an indication of the energy level of people in the 
working group willing to work on the document.



Thanks!



Jim, Bruno & Joel



_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to