> I am not attempting to revisit the question of whether RFC 8986 complies > with RFC 4191. > This compression documents raises additional issues beyond those in 8986 > in some aspects of the flavors it describes.
Could you be so kind and enumerate where in the draft you see *anything* crossing the line by defining new semantics for the ARG part of the SID as defined in RFC8986 ? Hint: your argument could have been sustainable if RFC8986 would put additional restrictions on the ARG field. But it does not. Many thx, Robert
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
