Below is an email Jen sent as co-chair of 6man, asking specifically for
SPRING input on some questions. Please comment on the questions asked
below.
Yours,
Joel
------
Hello,
This email starts the 6man Working Group Last Call for the "Segment
Identifiers in SRv6" draft
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6man-sids).
The WGLC ends on Tue, Oct 4, 23:59:59 UTC.
As the document is closely related to the work in the SPRING WG, we'd
like the SPRING WG to review the document and discuss the following
questions:
- the action items required from SPRING (Section 4.1 and 4.2 of the
draft,https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6man-sids-01#section-4)
[*]. Would it make sense to merge those open issues with the 'Open
Issues' section of
the SPRING document?
- whether the document needs more guidance regarding routability of
/16 or such requirements shall belong to some other document? In
particular, shall we specify that it MUST NOT be in the DFZ? Or
setting 'Globally Reachable = false' in the registry should be
sufficient? The current idea is that the prefix needs to fail closed
and not be routable by default.
[*] The draft currently refers to the individual submission instead of
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
- the link will be updated in the next revision.
Please review the draft and send your comments to the list/
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
