Hi Robert,

This is because the two SFF's in the diagram are directly connected so the SFF2 
label is not needed as SFF2 will act upon the top entry (SF2). If the two SFFs 
were not directly connected then the SFF2 entry would be there until the 
penultimate hop. Hope this helps clarify (caveat: I win no prizes for my 
diagrams LOL).

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 11:07 AM
To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-nsh...@ietf.org; spring-cha...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; 
bruno.decra...@orange.com; bruno.decra...@orange.com
Subject: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr-12: (with 
COMMENT)

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email 
addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory 
paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

Thanks for this document.  I have one minor comment/question:

Minor level comments:

(1) p 9, sec 4.  SR-based SFC with Integrated NSH Service Plane

             +------------+        +------------+        +------------+
             |   S(SF1)   |        |   S(SF2)   |        | F:Inner Pkt|
             +------------+        +------------+        +------------+
             |   S(SFF2)  |        | N(100,254) |
             +------------+        +------------+
             |   S(SF2)   |        | F:Inner Pkt|
             +------------+        +------------+
             | N(100,255) |
             +------------+
             | F:Inner Pkt|
             +------------+

>From this diagram, it wasn't clear to me why the segments have got from "SF1,
SFF2, SF2" at step (1) to just "SF2" at step (4).

Regards,
Rob



_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to