Reviewer: Sarah Banks
Review result: Has Issues

Hi,

Major issues: None
Minor issues:

I echo the sentiments of another reviewer with the security section; in
particular, are the security considerations cited in RFC8754 strong enough,
considering the replication of packets here? (It's OK if they are, but I wonder
if it's worth calling out in the doc that this was explicitly considered and
the authors landed at the same conclusion).

Readers not yet experts in SR would likely have a hard time distinguishing from
this draft which terms are net new in the document, versus those defined in
RFCs or other drafts; a clarifying terminology section would help, or
specifically citing terms to RFCs would help.

Thank you,
Sarah


_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to