Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment-15: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment-15 Thank you for the work put into this document. It is quite dense and not too easy to read though, perhaps adding some graphics? Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be appreciated even if only for my own education), and one nit. Special thanks to Mankamana Prasad Mishra for the shepherd's detailed write-up including the WG consensus and the justification of the intended status. I hope that this review helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric # COMMENTS ## Section 1 The reader would probably welcome use case of this protocol: is it for multicast ? or more like a span port for monitoring/troubleshooting ? Waiting until section 3 is not really reader friendly. ## Section 2 `When the PCE signals a Replication segment to its node` what is 'its node' ? ## Section 2.2 In the 2nd paragraph, is the segment left field also decremented ? ## Section 2.2.3 Thanks for this section (no need to reply). # NITS ## Section 4.2 s/has all the Must and SHOULD clause/has all the MUST and SHOULD clauses/ ? _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
