Hi Joel and WG,

I think this issue can be closed.As illustrated in the draft,all the SRv6 SIDs 
can co-exist.It is coherent with the one data plane solution objective.



Best Regards,

Liyan





----邮件原文----发件人:Joel Halpern  <j...@joelhalpern.com>收件人:SPRING WG List  
<spring@ietf.org>抄 送: (无)发送时间:2023-08-01 05:08:34主题:[spring] Issue 1 regarding 
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression                     As per the 
discussions on list and at IETF 117, the SPRING WG       chairs (myself and 
Alvaro specifically) are attempting to       determine if we can close the open 
issues regarding 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression/        
The editors have entered proposed resolutions for all open       issues.  This 
email is to determine if the working group considers       issue 1 closable.

Issue 1 reads:

Given that the working group has said         that it wants to standardize one  
     data plane solution, and given that         the document contains multiple 
SRv6       EndPoint behaviors that some WG         members have stated are 
multiple data       plane solutions, the working group         will address 
whether this is valid       and coherent with its one data plane         
solution objective.

The editors have entered:

All SIDs of the SRv6 dataplane         (defined in this document and in other 
documents) can co-exist         in the same SRH. This make SRv6 a single, 
consistent dataplane         solution.

Please speak up if you agree this         resolves this issue, or if you 
consider that it does not resolve         the issue.  Objections (and even 
support if practical) should be         specific as to the technical grounds 
for the statement.  Silence         will not be considered consent.

This call will run for 3 weeks to         allow time for at least some 
people39s August vacations and in         hopes fo getting a clear reading from 
the WG.

Separate calls for other issues will         be issued on a schedule that the 
chairs have selected to try to         balance getting sufficient focus with 
getting this done, as it         has been a long time.

Note that if the WG agrees that all         issues may be marked as closed, the 
chairs anticipate issuing         the WG last call shortly after that is 
determined.  Speaking up         early will help us in all dimensions.  If we 
determine that not         all issues can be marked as closed, the chairs will 
work with         the document editors to determine suitable next steps.       

Thank you,

Joel       



_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to