Hi, all

    I support the close of the issue.
 
Best Ragards
Zongpeng Du



[email protected] & [email protected] 
 
From: Joel Halpern
Date: 2023-08-08 23:00
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] Confimring resolution of issue #5 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
Issue #5 reads:
The use of C-SIDs might cause some difficulty in troubleshooting error 
conditions signaled by ICMPv6. Section 5.4 of [RFC8754] describes the ICMPv6 
error processing that is required to be performed on the SR Source Nodes to 
correlate packets since the Destination Address of the packet changes in flight.
Similar logic needs to be specified for SR Source Nodes that use C-SIDs to 
determine the Destination Address for use by protocol-error handlers.
The response from the editors reads:
Added text in revision -03 (Sec. 10.3) generalizing the RFC 8754 behavior for 
the SIDs defined in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression.
Repeatedly apply the SID behavior until doing so would result in processing the 
upper-layer header
The destination address at the last iteration is the ultimate destination of 
the packet

Please indicate to the list whether you consider this resolution sufficient to 
close the issue, or have further concerns that should be addressed.  If you 
have concerns, clarity about them is appreciated. This call is open for two 
weeks, through August 22.
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to