Hey there,
So, it's over a year since Bruno asked this question, and eight months since the current revision expired. I don' see anything on the list, and there was no mention in the meeting at IETF-118. Can we have a status and plan, please? It's OK if the authors have decided to give up on their efforts with the draft, but unless the WG has also given up (it was an adopted draft) it may be time assign new editors to move forward. Thanks, Adrian From: spring <[email protected]> On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: 26 September 2022 12:52 To: Kamran Raza (skraza) <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: SPRING WG <[email protected]>; Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang-01 Hi Kamran, authors, Thanks for the refreshed draft. What's the status/ETA with regards to incorporating comments from the WG, e.g. the ones below from Dhruv which are two years/revisions old. Thank you, Bruno From: spring <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 6:00 AM To: Kamran Raza (skraza) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; SPRING WG <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang-01 Hi Kamran, Thank you! The most important thing to me would be to make the model work at the device as well as the controller (an example that would be adding headend into the SR-policy). Thanks! Dhruv PS. Past comments I sent during adoption - https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/KzXFvavQxwkYLG6unN70JK0Mwno/ On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 8:29 PM Kamran Raza (skraza) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Hi Dhruv, The I.D will be refreshed and updated once submissions reopen. Apologies for the extended delay in updating it .. Rgds. From: Dhruv Dhody <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 10:12 AM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, SPRING WG <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang-01 Hi Authors/WG, The I-D in question expired last year! In fact, there has been no change since its adoption back in May of 2019. None of the comments received during the adoption calls are handled - https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/9Hy8jfOmVP9vmXXaSJ6mISwYCRM/ BTW there are various documents that are importing it - https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/impact_analysis?rfcs=1 <https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/impact_analysis?rfcs=1&show_subm=1&; show_dir=dependents&[email protected],ietf-sr-policy-ty [email protected]&orgtags=ietf> &show_subm=1&show_dir=dependents&[email protected],ietf [email protected]&orgtags=ietf Could we get clarity on the status of this I-D? Thanks! Dhruv Orange Restricted ____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
