Hi
I read the drafts and my understanding is as follows:
· Technical merits and drawbacks of each solution
draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-16
- a table/space/process is required to store and learn the mapping info between
Remote-VPN-SID and VPN;
- function on forwarding plane is easy to achieve
draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection-05
- A new flavor，provide a clean and more fundamental design/solution on the
forwarding plane capabilities;
-statically setting for the primary/backup relationship is not mandatory.
· Do we need these different solutions?
Yes, i think these two do not provide an alternative solution, when
considering the existence of network with different scale and device with
different capability.
I support the adoption, with take the similar point of view to Li Hao
B.R
Fang Gao
| |
gaofang
|
|
gaof...@zgclab.edu.cn
|
---- Replied Message ----
| From | Feng Yang<yangf...@chinamobile.com> |
| Date | 2/19/2024 16:51 |
| To | <spring@ietf.org> |
| Subject | Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call -
draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection (02/09/24 - 02/24/24) |
Hi Yingzhen,
The verified solution here I stated based on the lab test of several routers,
e.g. H3C, ZTE.
在 2024-02-19 07:45, Yingzhen Qu 写道:
Hi,
You mentioned "verified solution", are you aware of any implementation or
deployment?
Thanks,
Yingzhen
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 12:35 AM Feng Yang <yangf...@chinamobile.com> wrote:
Hi,
Support.
This is a simple, fast, verified solution for tail end protection.
在 2024-02-10 03:30, Yingzhen Qu 写道:
Hi,
This email begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft:
draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection-05 - SRv6 Egress Protection
in Multi-homed scenario (ietf.org) Please review the document and indicate your
support or objections by Feb 24th, 2024.
Please note that there is an existing WG
document:draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-16 - SRv6 Path Egress
Protection Which proposes fast protections for the egress node and link of an
SRv6 path through extending IGP and using Mirror SID. As you discuss adopting
draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection, please also consider:
Do we need these different solutions?
Technical merits and drawbacks of each solution
If there is any implementation of the proposals, please voice it.
Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any IPR
that applies to the draft.
Also copying SPRING WG.
Thanks,
Yingzhen (RTGWG Co-chair)
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list spring@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
--
BR,
Feng Yang （杨锋）
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list spring@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
--
BR,
Feng Yang （杨锋）_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
