Andrew, I will fix the nits in the next revision.
-> should "path" and "paths" be capitalized when in context of "Candidate > path" ?. Related, some text has "candidate path" and others has "Candidate > path". > > > I will make all occurrence consistent as "Candidate Path(s)" > > Section 4.1.1 > > -> Bullet 3. Create candidate path should likely include the same > arguments as update (Preference, Constraints, Optimization, ...) > I will make this change. Thanks, Rishabh. *From: *spring <[email protected]> on behalf of Michael McBride < [email protected]> > > *Date: *Sunday, April 21, 2024 at 10:37 PM > *To: *[email protected] <[email protected]> > *Cc: *[email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject: *[spring] wglc: draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy > > Hello good people, > > > > Today begins a two week wglc for > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy-08. > The related (normative) replication segment draft has now been published as > a standards track RFC. The poll in the Brisbane pim room was 3 in favor and > 0 against. Please respond with your opinions on the advancement of this > draft. > > > > Thanks, > > mike > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pim mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
