< copying SPRING WG and authors of the SR Policy YANG draft >

Hi Mahesh,

Thanks for your review of the document.

Since your comments are for draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang, I should
relay them to the authors of that document and the SPRING WG. AFAIK that
document is still work-in-progress.

Thanks,
Ketan


On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 3:03 AM Mahesh Jethanandani via Datatracker <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Mahesh Jethanandani has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-11: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks for adding a separate manageability section to outline how the
> feature
> is going to be managed. And thanks to Roman for catching the fact that the
> referenced YANG module draft had expired.
>
> Looking at draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang and granted it is still a
> draft, I
> could not help noticing the paucity of statistics being maintained for the
> feature supported by this draft. Granted, this comment is more for the
> other
> draft, but I wonder if enough thought has been given to what would be
> required
> to manage the feature in the network. For example, these are the only
> counters
> associated with policies that I could find.
>
>          description
>            "Counters containing stats related to forwarding";
>
>          leaf pkts {
>            type yang:counter64;
>            description "Number of packets forwarded";
>          }
>          leaf octets {
>            type yang:counter64;
>            units "byte";
>            description "Number of bytes forwarded";
>          }
>
> Description or lack of it aside, what it appears to be counting is the
> number
> of packets or octets forwarded when the policy is successfully installed.
> How
> do these stats help with debugging if the policy was learned by the
> headend in
> the first place or the number of candidate paths it learned?
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to