Thanks Alvaro. I will split the document and post both shortly. From: Alvaro Retana <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2025 at 11:43 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Splitting the SRv6 YANG Document (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-yang)
Dear authors: We received no objections to splitting the document. Please go ahead with the changes: - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-yang should continue to include the SRv6 Types and SRv6 Base modules - (new) draft-ietf-spring-srv6-yang-static should contain the SRv6 Static module Thanks! Alvaro. On August 5, 2025 at 11:49:02 AM, Alvaro Retana ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) wrote: Dear spring WG: During the recent meeting in Madrid, the authors of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-yang (YANG Data Model for SRv6 Base and Static) requested opinions on splitting the document into two: - The current document would continue to include the SRv6 Types and SRv6 Base modules (see §6.1 and 6.2). - A new WG document will contain the SRv6 Static module (see §6.3). For more background, please see the slides from IETF 123: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/123/materials/slides-123-spring-update-on-yang-models-for-srv6-base-and-static-00 The objective of this split is to progress the base model faster. If anyone objects, please reply to this message by EOD on August 13, 2025. Thanks! Alvaro.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
