One more comment: Does this document update RFC9256? If so, the authors please consider to indicate this point at the front page. Thanks.
BR, Zhenqiang Li ----邮件原文---- 发件人："李振强" <[email protected]> 收件人：AlvaroRetana <[email protected]>,spring <[email protected]>,spring-chairs <[email protected]>,draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection <[email protected]> 抄 送: (无) 发送时间：2026-05-09 12:39:56 主题：Re:[spring] Call for adoption:draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection-14 (Ends 2026-05-08) Hello all, I have read this document, which is solving a very useful scenario. The content is stable enough. So, I support the adoption. BR, Zhenqiang Li ----邮件原文---- 发件人：Alvaro Retana via Datatracker 收件人：spring ,spring-chairs ,draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection 抄 送: (无) 发送时间：2026-04-24 23:08:21 主题：[spring] Call for adoption: draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection-14 (Ends 2026-05-08) This message starts a spring WG Call for Adoption of: draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection-14 This Working Group Call for Adoption ends on 2026-05-08 Abstract: This document describes a flexible method for selecting candidate Segment Routing (SR) policy paths. Based on the real-time resource usage and forwarding quality of candidate paths, the head node can perform dynamic path switching among multiple candidate paths in the SR policy. Please reply to this message and indicate whether or not you support adoption of this Internet-Draft by the spring WG. Comments to explain your preference are greatly appreciated. Also, please indicate your willingness to review future versions of this document. Reply to all recipients of this message and include this message in your response. Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2]. Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be found at [3]. Thank you. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/ The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection/ There is also an HTMLized version available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection-14 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection-14 _______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Subject：[spring] Call for adoption: draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection-14 (Ends 2026-05-08) This message starts a spring WG Call for Adoption of: draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection-14 This Working Group Call for Adoption ends on 2026-05-08 Abstract: This document describes a flexible method for selecting candidate Segment Routing (SR) policy paths. Based on the real-time resource usage and forwarding quality of candidate paths, the head node can perform dynamic path switching among multiple candidate paths in the SR policy. Please reply to this message and indicate whether or not you support adoption of this Internet-Draft by the spring WG. Comments to explain your preference are greatly appreciated. Also, please indicate your willingness to review future versions of this document. Reply to all recipients of this message and include this message in your response. Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2]. Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be found at [3]. Thank you. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/ The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection/ There is also an HTMLized version available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection-14 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection-14 _______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
