This concludes the WG adoption call for draft-lin-bgp-ls-sr-policy-admin-flags.
The WG has reached consensus that this draft should be adopted and the flags
from draft-ali-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-sl-opt-distribution-00 merged into this
draft.
This consensus completes the adoption process. The authors have already
submitted this draft.
Cheerily, Sue Hares
My earlier discussion:
==========
IDR WG and Spring WG
I missed a step in the calls in the combination of calls below. I did not
specifically call for an adoption of
draft-lin-bgp-ls-sr-policy-admin-flags-03.txt in the call for 3 drafts attached
below prior to combining it with
draft-ali-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-sl-opt-distribution-00.txt.
This starts a WG adoption call for
draft-lin-bgp-ls-sr-policy-admin-flags-03.txt. The authors should reply to
this message with an IPR statement.
The WG should consider:
1) Does draft-lin-bgp-ls-sr-policy-admin-flags - provide the correct flags to
be queried by BGP-LS?
Are there some missing? Is this a good start? Are there technical flaws
2) After asking question 1, consider does it still make sense to merge
draft-ali-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-sl-opt-distribution-00 and
draft-lin-bgp-ls-sr-policy-admin-flags-03.txt.
3) Is there any drafts in the same area that should be considered?
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
