Mohamed Boucadair has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments-19: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Jie, Takuya, Yongqing, Fengwei, and Zhenqiang, Thank you for the discussion and changes made in -19 [1]. These address almost all points raised in my previous ballot [2]. I think RFC9543 need to be listed as normative as both Global/Local resource-aware segment concepts depend on NRP, which is defined in that RFC. Please fix that. CURRENT: * Network Resource Partition (NRP): refer to the definition in [RFC9543]. The following terms are introduced by this document. ... * Global resource-aware segment: A resource-aware segment which is associated with the full set of the resources allocated to an NRP. ... * Local resource-aware segment: A resource-aware segment which is only associated with a specific set of local resource on a network node or link participating in an NRP.... Cheers, Med [1] https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments-18&url2=draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments-19&difftype=--html [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/io1SZQ2wW1I5U-tEOiYps0RsLDo/ _______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
