+ rfc-editor I concur with Alvaro. This looks like a candidate for 'held for document update' to me. Ideally the document should have covered the Decline messages but this cannot be done via an errata.
I recommend we apply this action unless someone objects or provides a correction. Thanks, Ketan On Thu, Oct 8, 2026 at 1:04 AM Alvaro Retana <[email protected]> wrote: > [- rfc-editor] > > Paul: > > Hi! > > Disclaimer: I am not a DHCP expert. > > The SRv6 locators are assigned, not delegated. So, in this case, I believe > it's okay for a client to use Decline. > > What may be missing is a description in the document of how and when to > use them, similar to what is already there for the other messages. > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. > > On October 7, 2026 at 2:35:46 PM, [email protected] ( > [email protected]) wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC10038, > "Distributing the Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) Locator Using DHCPv6" > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://errata.rfc-editor.org/eid9211/ > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Paul Aitken <[email protected]> > > Section 5.2 says: > > Original Text > ------------- > A client uses Request, Renew, Rebind, Release, and Decline messages > during the normal lifecycle of SRv6 Locator assignment. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > A client uses Request, Renew, Rebind, and Release messages during > the normal lifecycle of SRv6 Locator assignment. > > Notes > ----- > Section 5.2 lists the Decline message as part of the SRv6 Locator > assignment lifecycle, but the Decline message is not supported elsewhere in > the document. "Decline" applies to assigned addresses and is not used for > delegated prefixes, so it does not apply here. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". Please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC10038 (draft-ietf-spring-dhc-distribute-srv6-locator-dhcp) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Distributing the Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) Locator Using > DHCPv6 > Publication Date : August 2026 > Author(s) : W. Cheng, Ed., R. Han, C. Lin, Ed., D. Voyer, G. Zhang > Category : Proposed Standard > Source : spring (rtg) > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
