Thank you WG and Alvaro. We have posted the updated draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-mpls/ Thanks, Rakesh (for authors) On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 9:29 AM Alvaro Retana <[email protected]> wrote: > There is clear support to change the status of this document. > > Authors: please resubmit the document with the new status so that we can > start the WGLC. > > Thank you! > > Alvaro. > > On October 2, 2026 at 2:40:15 AM, Alvaro Retana ([email protected]) > wrote: > > > Dear WG: > > Haoyu Song is the Shepherd for this document. During his review, he > proposed changing the Intended Status of this work from Informational to > Standards Track. Here is his justification: > > Here’s the reason to support the standard type: the document describes > standard procedures and protocol extensions for using STAMP over > SR-MPLS > networks. It specifies control and data plane interactions, > encapsulation > methods, and interoperability mechanisms that require standardization > to > ensure consistent implementations across different vendor hardware. > Protocol > extensions designed for widespread implementation and interoperability > belong on the standards track. > > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/EzMtFTSXO572dfHiiNi07hC9v0M/ > > > Although he sent the message to the list, we haven't heard any other > opinions (besides Rakesh's, as a co-author). > > We would like to hear opinions on Haoyu's proposed change. > > Please explain why you might be in favor of, or against, a change in the > Status. > > We will take opinions until Oct/15, 2026. > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
