I’ve updated the shepherd writeup based on the latest revision. There’s no more issue left for this document.
Best regards, Haoyu From: Rakesh Gandhi <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2026 6:53 AM To: Alvaro Retana <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; Haoyu Song <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [mpls] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-mpls-12 (Ends 2026-11-04) Hi Alvaro, WG, I believe the document is ready to progress to the next steps, and support WGLC, as a co-author. Thanks, Rakesh On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 3:53 PM Alvaro Retana via Datatracker <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: This message starts a WG Last Call for: draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-mpls-12 This Working Group Last Call ends on 2026-11-04 Abstract: Segment Routing (SR) can be used to steer packets through a network employing source routing. SR can be applied to both MPLS (SR-MPLS) and IPv6 (SRv6) data planes. This document specifies procedures for performance measurement in SR-MPLS networks using the Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP), as specified in RFC 8762, along with its optional extensions specified in RFC 8972 and the SR- specific extensions specified in RFC 9503. These procedures measure SR-MPLS paths, including Segment Lists of SR-MPLS Policies, SR-MPLS IGP best paths, and SR-MPLS IGP Flexible Algorithm (Flex-Algo) paths, as well as Layer-3 and Layer-2 services carried over those paths. File can be retrieved from: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-mpls-12.txt Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the publication of this document by replying to this email keeping [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> in copy. Objections should be explained and suggestions to resolve them are highly appreciated. This document requires in-depth technical reviews to move forward. Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [1]. Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be found at [3]. Thank you. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/ The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-mpls/ There is also an HTML version available at: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-mpls-12.html A diff from the previous version is available at: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-mpls-12 _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
