Take a normal piece of carpet, adhere a pad (very thin) to the back, cut it into 2x2 or 3x3 squares, add the stickey stuff and walaah, you have carpet tiles. Mark at Aero -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thom McMahon Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 11:10 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Carpet Padding Commodity Classification
I believe that the carpet tiles that NFPA refers to (and some committee member correct me if I've got the wrong impression) are similar to the high traffic wear tile used in airports entry's and high traffic public areas. These are made by some MFG from old tires, and contain high levels of rubber and plastic. It would be the storage of these that would concern me more than an installed area. Thom McMahon Firetech, Inc. 2560 Copper Ridge Dr Steamboat Springs, CO 80488-2136 Tel: 970-879-7952 Fax: 970-879-7926 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Smith, Steven D. (CSFD)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 10:02 AM Subject: RE: Carpet Padding Commodity Classification Thanks Paul. I agree. And I may have to apologize to the forum. I may be looking at trying to compare apples to oranges. The 2003 IFC calls out "Rugs without foam backing" as a Class III com. When the rugs have a foam back then it's a Class IV com. Again according to the 03 IFC. NFPA 13 states that cartoned carpet tiles are Group A plastics. I may not correctly be thinking what carpet tiles are, but to me they are nothing more than carpet with pad, that are cut up into 1x1 foot squares and installed in a similar fashion as other forms of tiles. Are rugs the same as carpet? Inherently, I say yes. The intent of my original question is to determine a commodity classification from the IFC point of view to determine requirements for a warehouse storing such commodities. The IFC does have a provision that states where differences occur between the code and a referenced standard, the code shall apply (apples and oranges). Ok. I'll buy that for a buck, but if for high pile storage purposes of the IFC, a facility is classified as a Class 3 or 4 commodity, I can see problems when the sprinkler designer and/or AHJ calls out Group A plastics or high hazard. I guess I'm trying to understand the differences in classifications between the code and standard for a seemingly same commodity. Hope my gibberish makes sense. Steve -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Pinigis Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 9:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Carpet Padding Commodity Classification It is an expanded plastic, but you would need to know what materials are used to be any more specific. Paul J. Pinigis, P.E. Chief Life Safety Engineer _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
