Boy, I hope the sprinkler heads aren't deemed "outlets". No sense in installing concealed heads and then hanging NONPOTABLE and NO COATHANGER signs on them.
I can't wait for a local interpretation to fight on this one..... Glc TGIF -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brooks, Bill Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 9:31 AM To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: Backflow: Sprinkler System Identification John, what a reference! This means we should be adding these signs to our sprinkler system specifications. Would you say one of these signs should be provided at the termination of the inspector's test, at each drum drip on a dry system, and at various low point drains on our systems, etc, etc? This is a serious question - do you think this is the intent of 2006 NSPC 10.2? Is this same provision in the International Plumbing Code? Bill Brooks Pittsburgh, PA -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Drucker Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 9:16 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Backflow: Sprinkler System Indentification 2006 NSPC 10.2 Identification of Potable and Non Potable Water "In buildings where dual water distribution systems are installed, one potable and the other non-potable water, each system shall be identified by color marking or metal tags, or other appropriate methods such as may be approved by the authority having jurisdiction. Each outlet on the non-potable water line that may be used for drinking or domestic purposes shall be posted: DANGER-UNSAFE WATER." "Service and Background Color - Fire Protection = Red" _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
