Absolutely correct !   Interestingly despite all the verbal claims by
contractors the requested documentation is rarely produced and the proposal
soon abandoned.

Its like being in line for parachutes, no one wants to be at the end of the
line.

John Drucker
Fire Protection Subcode Official (AHJ)
New Jersey

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Leyton
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 7:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Flexhead on CPVC

Good point.   In situations like this, I look at it from a lawyer's
perspective - what was the basis for the decision to apply the product this
way?   If the tech data sheet is mute, I always contact the manufacturer
directly and ask if they'll warranty the application in writing or furnish
an engineered judgment on their titleblock or letterhead.   That usually
gets to the bottom line pretty quickly ...

Steve Leyton
Protection Design & Consulting


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of scott
mitchell
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 4:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Flexhead on CPVC

If one depends on the listing to determine and state such a conflict, one is
walking on thin ice.  In other words, don't look at the absence of a
restriction in the listing and conclude that "it must be ok". 
 
The listing agency does a series of tests/evaluations based on requirements
in the applicable standard (NFPA 13 in this case).  Unfortunately, if NFPA
13 is ambiguous or doesn't address the arrangement, the listing agency
covers by making a blanket requirement such as "must comply with the
manufacturers installation instructions and NFPA 13".  This passes the buck
back to the standard and THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. 
 
So, if you ever hear someone state, "It's OK!! It's listed!!!", think twice
and ask, "Listed for what? What tests were conducted that prove it's OK to
do this?"   
 
J. Scott Mitchell, PE
Fire Protection Engineer

--- On Fri, 6/27/08, Bobby Gillett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

From: Bobby Gillett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Flexhead on CPVC
To: [email protected]
Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 2:17 PM

Make sure you are using the cpvc sprinkler tees, I don't see any other
issues as long as listings don't say any different.

Bobby Gillett
Project Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(731)-424-0130
     
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Williams
- FPDC
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:58 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Flexhead on CPVC

I'm working on a project where the client wants to use flexheads (or 
one of the clones) off CPVC pipe. Is there any restriction on this? 
Could the bending of the flexhead potentially put some weird forces 
on the CPVC pipe and glued fittings that could cause a problem? They 
claim they do it all of the time, but I've never seen it.

Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, Connecticut
www.fpdc.com
860.535.2080  
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


      
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3224 (20080627) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3224 (20080627) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to