There is wording in every code which refers to any variations as being subject 
to the approval of the AHJ. In most cases he is the final authority and can say 
yea or nay.

If as a contractor you are commissioned to install a system that has the 
potential to be sub-standard and you inform the EOR and AHJ of the issues 
before installation and the EOR and AHJ both accept the limitations as 
acceptable risk, then you as the contractor should not be liable if the system 
doesn't work, they should.

Now if there is no EOR and no AHJ and you, the contractor install the system 
anyway, crossing your fingers and hoping that your system will never be brought 
into service, then YOU have assumed the liability.

If a contractor is operating outside his "safe area" I'd say many times it's 
because he has chosen to.  If you don't get a warm fuzzy feeling about a 
particular job and have grounds to doubt the design criteria or can even prove 
it's in error, first step is to go through the proper protocol for the project 
and either contact the EOR or the GC or the Owner and point out the issue.

If you're doing design-build work where you may be doing the design and 
installation then you should have confidence in your install otherwise you've 
got the wrong people working for you.

One thing I've found is that a lot of sprinkler designers live within NFPA 13 
and never venture outside of that.  If you have opportunity to go to some of 
the building code seminars you need to.  There are many issues that affect fire 
protection design and that is one big area of understanding where many EOR's 
drop the ball.

Craig L. Prahl, CET
Fire Protection Group
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ch2m.com

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Cahill
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 2:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Entry Vestibule situation...

Which brings up a little twist to think about.  Just because the powers that be 
approve or accept something that is normally not compliant with the code 
doesn't mean it shields you from liabilities that may arise out of not 
complying with the code.

For example if a building requires per code a .6/2000 but the water isn't there 
and the AHJ approves a .3/1500 you most likely have assumed complete cost for 
the building and contents if there was ever a loss.  Now I doubt you had that 
in your estimate.  It's not hard and fast and design professionals that spec 
the wrong density become your best friends.  Too often we contracts are 
operating outside the safe area.

In your case if you don't put a head through the glass as I understand it you 
are buying any problems that arise out of the head not being there because no 
one can come up with a code reason that exempts the location.
Well Thom has an idea on filling the space with non-combustibles.  Doesn't 
matter if the AHJ accepts it.  With an equivalency you may have some more 
protection but unless you have a PE on board you are probably running afoul of 
other laws. Of course I can't think of an equivalency off the top of my head 
either.

Just an issue that comes up on the forum from time to time that doesn't get 
talked about much on the forum.

Chris Cahill, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer
Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.

763-658-4483
763-658-4921 fax

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mail: P.O. Box 69
        Waverly, MN 55390

Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
              Waverly, MN 55390
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RFI - Bismarck
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 12:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Entry Vestibule situation...

Thanks all...
Justin pin-pointed it.  It's a glass enclosure with concrete walls, ceiling, 
and floor protruding 'out'.  I'm looking strictly as a combustible area - 
nothing combustible about it...

I have a meeting today w/ the powers that be to determine the fate of this 
space.  Thanks for the info of ammunition to present!

RFP C

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Reid
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 11:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Entry Vestibule situation...

Sounds like this is the entry to the building and is all glass (which is 
probably giving the access issues). You may be able to apply for an exception 
based on the argument that the vestibule is a circulation pathway and therefore 
will not likely contain combustibles. Otherwise, the architect needs to provide 
a means to conceal the pipe or they will have to accept exposed pipe.

Let the design team know that there is no guarantee the sprinkler can be 
omitted from the space and that they should begin planning to accommodate the 
sprinkler head. Then meet with the AHJ and state the case.

Regards,

Justin D. Reid, P.E.
Project Engineer
RLH Fire Protection
468 N. Camden Dr. #290L
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Office: (310) 601-3013
Cell: (213) 798-0251
Fax: (866) 871-2237
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Greenman
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 9:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Entry Vestibule situation...

Why would "access" to a "small entry vestibule" be "close to impossible?" Seems 
that an "entry vestibule" would be the one thing most accessible. Question 
aside, if there is access then the space space is not concealed, and even if 
non-combustible, requires sprinklering. I just had an ME argue that if you put 
"Authorized Personnel Only" signs on locked doors then the space behind that 
door was concealed. He got an Honorable Mention for stupid but creative try. 
Tis was in a jurisdiction where I'm told that the Building Official holds the 
Fire Marshal in high regard because of the latter's "creativity" in finding 
ways to avoid sprinklers by "clever"
interpretations of the code.

2008/7/16 RFI - Bismarck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Forum...
>
> Have a building with a situation that I need help in addressing -
small
> entry vestibule (14'8" x 7') which has glass exterior and interior
doors and
> windows - full height; with concrete walls, floor, and ceiling
enclosing it.
> Access to this area is close to impossible...  Is there anything in
NFPA that
> I'm missing which would allow me to exclude this area?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> RFP Chuck
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.5.0/1555 - Release Date:
7/16/2008
> 6:43 AM
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>



--
Ron Greenman
at home....
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) 
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.5.0/1555 - Release Date: 7/16/2008
6:43 AM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.5.0/1555 - Release Date: 7/16/2008
6:43 AM


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to