Create your own test.  Light a controlled fire like a pan of heptane or
alcohol in the space with the lycra installed and see what happens with just
overhead sprinklers.  Find some local FPE's or arson investigators to help
they'd love it.  Could find a warehouse with an 18' ceiling if they don't
want to use the new building.  Scale is important so don't go with an 8' FD
burn house.  

Chris Cahill, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer
Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.
 
763-658-4483
763-658-4921 fax
 
Email: [email protected]
 
Mail: P.O. Box 69
        Waverly, MN 55390
 
Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
              Waverly, MN 55390
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Allan Seidel
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:26 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Is there test information that shows whether or not obstructing
lycrafabric ceiling elements are an issue?

The interiors architect plans to populate an open structure ceiling
condition with many Lycra "kites" stretched horizontal at 11 foot in an 18
foot ceiling deck area above a light hazard space. The kite sizes are many
times larger than 48" and there are so many of these in an overlapping
pattern that one cannot even start to argue that these are not gross
obstructions. Conditions are such that is not possible to install sprinklers
underneath the fabric without penetrating vertically through the
fabric. The architect wants to convince the AHJ that the Lycra will
"disappear" in a fire condition, citing the fact that none of the product
installation photos show sprinklers. Is there test information that shows
whether or not obstructing, horizontal Lycra fabric ceiling elements are or
are not an issue for sprinklers. One would assume such tests would indicate
fabric thickness, installed tension and other factors. This question will be
posed to the manufacturer. If anyone would know something about it, it is
probably someone on this forum. One can make up all sorts
of plausible things the Lycra might do in fire condition but nothing would
compare to some actual tests.

Looking at this another way, is there merit in insisting the design area be
large enough to include all the kites in a plausible event area, perhaps
with a 30% penalty, and if so should the application rate be increased? Is
there supporting information for that line of thinking? It would be nice to
propose a defensible equivalency to the missing protection other than sales
brochures where the sprinkler protection has been photoshopped out.

Allan Seidel
St. Louis, MO
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to