Another part of the story.   I wonder if he is taking a little heat for his 
decision.  My question is how can the contractor go over the local AHJ to the 
state?  Isnt the local AHJ the one to deal with?



Tenn. Chief Defends Code Stance
Jun 16, 2009 5:35 PM
By Janet Wilmoth 
Would a fire chief with 36 years of fire service experience, 25 of them as a 
fire marshal, oppose the new 2009 ICC code for residential sprinklers in his 
community? According to Tennessean.com, Spring Hill (Tenn.) Chief Jim Swindle 
is asking city leaders to rethink a proposal that would require sprinklers in 
newly built homes, but adds that he supports sprinklers in general.
"I whole-heartedly support sprinklers. Always have and always will," he said. 
"At no time did I say I didn't support sprinklers."
Swindle supports the 2006 code, but would not recommend the most recent code 
update, deferring to the state. He said he contacted Asst. State Commissioner 
Jim Pillow and was told that the state of state was going to adopt the 2006 
codes and leave it up to the local jurisdictions to decide on the 2009 code. 
Consequently, Swindle did not recommend the new residential sprinkler code to 
his mayor and board of aldermen, in order to be "in the same song book" with 
the state.
"By Spring Hill not being an exempt city we have a tremendous amount of 
construction jobs going on that the state has to review," Swindle said. "If we 
are in the 2009 and the state is in the 2006 code, what code do you think the 
state will enforce? Spring Hill would not have any authority, as the 
contractors would just go right over our head."
However, the state has not yet voted on whether to adopt the 2009 ICC sprinkler 
codes, according to Pillow.
"It has not been determined," Pillow said. "That will be done by rule-making 
within the next three to six months." 
Tennessee is the only state that has a statute that protects the right of a 
locality to adopt its own sprinkler ordinance. There are 15 states that can 
pre-empt, but according to Pillow, "Tennessee is the only state that they will 
not be pre-empted."
Over my entire career, I have never not supported sprinklers," Swindle said. 
"But I have always stayed in direct correlation with the state fire marshal's 
office. Neither the construction community nor the political community had 
anything to do with this decision. It was a decision based on comments from the 
state."




________________________________
From: Thomas Reinhardt <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 3:31:46 PM
Subject: I'm embarrassed to be an AHJ(The Chief's thinking is disturbing)


The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:

Shortcut to: 
http://www.tennessean.com/article/20090615/COUNTY090101/906150306/1327/Fire+chief+opposes+proposed+sprinkler+law


Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending 
or receiving certain types of file attachments.  Check your e-mail security 
settings to determine how attachments are handled.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail message is intended to be received only by 
persons entitled to receive the confidential information it may contain. E-mail 
messages may contain information that is confidential and legally privileged. 
Please do not read, copy, forward, or store this message unless you are an 
intended recipient of it. If you have received this message in error, please 
forward it to the sender and delete it completely from your computer system.



      
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to