Congratulations Joe!! We have lost our battle here in SD. It is now a foregone 
conclusion. We will regroup and come back with more resolve, a better plan and 
a better understanding of their approach next year. Kudos to Kansas!


                     Rod DiBona
                     Vice President
                           Rapid Fire Protection
                     605-348-2342 office
                     605-348-0108 fax
                    605-391-3553 cell



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe Heinrich
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 9:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Builders get revote on bill banning local sprinkler laws

But the good guys eventually prevailed.  Following is a summary from the
article.

 

Sprinkler ban falls

A sharply divided House voted down Friday a bill that would have prohibited
city and county governments from ordering installation of fire sprinklers in
residential buildings with four or fewer living units.

The chamber voted 60-62 against House Bill 2515, which was opposed by
firefighter groups and local government officials. It was endorsed by
mobile-home manufacturers, builders and Realtors.

Debate boiled down to whether the added cost of installing a
fire-suppression system in new homes would weaken recovery of industries
involved in construction and housing. In addition, questions were raised
about the Legislature overriding authority of local units of government.

 

Joe Heinrich

Bamford Fire Sprinkler Co., Inc.

1383 W. North St. - Salina, KS

Ph. (785) 825-7710  Fax (785) 825-0667

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Drucker
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 5:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: Builders get revote on bill banning local sprinkler laws

 

Builders get revote on bill banning local sprinkler laws

 

BY DION LEFLER

The Wichita Eagle

 

TOPEKA - A day after losing on a tie vote, builders and their supporters in

the state House of Representatives won a revote on a bill that would

prohibit local governments from mandating fire sprinklers in homes and small

apartment buildings.

 

Firefighters, cities and counties appeared to have fought House Bill 2515 to

a standstill Wednesday when it went down to defeat in a 59-59 tie.

 

But today, Rep. Scott Schwab, R-Olathe, moved to reconsider the bill. 

 

On the revote, it passed 65-55.

 

The bill would prohibit cities and counties from passing building codes that

require fire sprinklers in residential buildings of four units or less.

 

Schwab's call for reconsideration puts him at odds with the firefighters

from his hometown of Olathe, who strongly opposed the bill.

 

The decision also was at odds with his feeling about protecting local

control, but lawmakers had to protect the state economy, he said.

 

"You don't want a city passing civil code that can jeopardize the economy of

the entire state," he said. "That is when the state has to come in and put

in certain ceiling to protect the good of the entire state."

 

Before Wednesday's vote, Olathe firefighters and a representative of the

state Firefighters Association stood outside the House chamber handing

legislators orange fliers urging them to reject HB 2515. Olathe and Parsons

were mentioned in the debate as two cities that have already passed

requirements for fire sprinklers in triplexes and quadplexes.

 

Ron Ewing of the Firefighters Association said the trend is to require

sprinklers in new construction because of increased use of lightweight and

composite materials. 

 

Older wood-built homes could burn for about 20 minutes before they began to

collapse. With new homes, that "burn time" shortens to five minutes because

of the different materials used, he said.

 

Proponents of the bill included the state associations for Realtors,

builders and mobile-home manufacturers. They argued that requiring

sprinklers would add thousands of dollars to the cost of new homes and slow

their industries' recovery from the recession.

 

In addition to the firefighters, opponents included associations of cities

and counties that argued that sprinklers save lives and that a state law

restricting their building codes would infringe on local home-rule powers. 

 

 

http://www.kansas.com/news/story/1188614.html

 

John Drucker, CET

Fire Protection Subcode Official 

Fire/Building/Electrical Inspector

Fire Marshals Office

Borough of Red Bank, NJ

 

 

 

_______________________________________________

Sprinklerforum mailing list

[email protected]

http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

 

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

 

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]

(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to