I like the one about the smoke detector.

David Autry

Meininger Fire Protection Inc.
2521 W L St. Suite No.4
Lincoln, Ne 68522
Voice (402) 466-2616
Fax (402) 466-2617
[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of George Church
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 9:59 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [BULK] RE: fair story on sprinklers
Importance: Low

Recognize a few favorite sayings?

George Church'
Rowe Sprinkler
[email protected]
570-837-7647

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt Grise
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 9:57 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: fair story on sprinklers

Who is that guy they interviewed for the story? He really seems to know his
stuff!

Matt Grisé PE*, LEED AP
Sales Engineer
Alliance Fire Protection
*Licensed in KS & MO 

913.888.0647 ph
913.888.0618 f
913.927.0222 cell
www. AFPsprink.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of George Church
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 8:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: fair story on sprinklers

The Daily Item, Sunbury, PA
December 28, 2010
 
Sprinkler systems required for new homes starting next year By Tricia
Pursell The Daily Item Tue Dec 28, 2010, 01:07 AM EST 

MIDDLEBURG - While homebuilders may be groaning about a new state mandate
requiring fire sprinkler systems be installed in all homes constructed after
Jan. 1, a Snyder County sprinkler company is looking to double or triple its
workforce to meet expected future demands.

"I call it economic stimulus that actually reaches into Snyder County," said
George Church, president of Rowe Sprinkler Systems, of Middleburg, which
installs systems throughout central Pennsylvania and northern Maryland.

His company could add 20 employees, he said.

Don Rowe, of Penn Fire Protection, Selinsgrove, said he also expects
business to increase.

A similar mandate, specifically targeting the new construction of townhouses
after Jan. 1, 2010, increased their installations within multi-family
housing this year, he said.

While approximately 80 percent of his business is commercial, Rowe said he
is expecting to see at least a 20 percent increase for residential
installations as a result of the mandate.

The sprinkler systems, Rowe said, typically range from $1.75 to $2.50 per
square foot.

Though it wasn't a requirement at the time, there have been homeowners who
chose to install sprinkler systems for reasons including protecting their
families from fire.

Homeowners, however, can also save 5 or 10 percent on their insurance
policies if sprinkler systems are installed in their homes, according to
Jeff Smith, an agent with Nationwide in Lewisburg.

But with the systems costing anywhere from $4,000 to $6,000 for an
average-sized home, the expense may be enough to keep people from building
next year.

Expert Home Builders in Northumberland are seeing a rush this month of
customers who hope to begin the building process before the mandate takes
effect.

"It's generated a lot of traffic into our office in December," said Dennis
Reedy, production manager.

Based on that traffic, he said, it is safe to say, "I don't think the
general public sees (the mandate) as a plus."

The goal of Expert Home Builders is to build 50 homes a year, but the last
few years have been rough.

"New housing starts are down considerably," Reedy said. "That added cost
hasn't entered the picture yet. So it can't get better."

"I'm certain it's going to impact it negatively."

It's interesting, however, that the fear of the mandate, rather than very
low interest rates this year, has pushed more people to build sooner, Reedy
said.

The cost of a sprinkler system, between $4,000 and $6,000, can be saved in
just one year on a 30-year mortgage, he said.

Church, of Rowe Sprinkler Systems, said the cost is equal to about a $1 a
day on the mortgage, a third of the cost of carpeting, and about one and a
half percent of the entire cost of the home.

The cost, when put into perspective, shouldn't be the deciding factor, for
most, on whether to build a home, he said. For many who are willing to put
money into their home for upgrades, installing a sprinkler system may be a
similar decision to installing central vac.

Except sprinklers save lives when a fire hits.

"People don't die in sprinklered houses," Church said. "It just doesn't
happen."

It's unfortunate, he believes, that the technology has been around for 100
years, yet not enough people have taken advantage of it.

"I have sprinklers protecting my building here," Church said of his
business. "Why wouldn't I protect my family to the same degree as the
paperwork on my desk?"

The fire sprinkler requirement, according to David Smith, information
specialist with the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry, which is
the mandating agency, "was strongly supported by firefighters and fire
chiefs from across the country."

When you look at the history of fires at buildings with sprinklers,
according to John Grove, deputy chief of the Hummels Wharf Fire Department,
"in most of them, fires were kept very small and damage was kept down."

While smoke detectors have made a huge difference in savings lives, he said,
"Sprinklers are just the next step."

Smith, with the Department of Labor, said the extensive regulations of the
new mandate require sprinkler coverage in all areas of the dwelling.

A smoke detector, Church said, "is a device, when activated, tells you you
should have had a sprinkler system, but it's too late."

He likens smoke detectors to seat belts, and sprinklers to air bags in a
car.

Car manufacturers, he said, wouldn't take out either of them in order to
save on costs for car manufacturing, anymore than homebuilders should avoid
the cost of sprinkler systems.

While the cost for the systems may be more for those who get their water
from private wells - about $1,500 more - Church said these people are
typically living in remote areas, where it may take fire companies up to 20
minutes to arrive after a call for help.

In a press release issued Monday by the Pennsylvania Residential Fire
Sprinkler Coalition, a 15-year study of home fire sprinklers in Scottsdale
Arizona, showed the average loss per sprinklered fire incident to be $2,166
compared to more than $45,000 for unsprinklered homes.

The coalition's release spoke out against "misinformation" they say has been
distributed recently by the Pennsylvania Builders Association, including
their claim that the cost of the systems is $15,000.


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to