But with the separate control valves at the base of riser (as indicated in 8.16.1.6) you could protect 40,000ft² per In Rack System, correct?
Bobby Gillett Sr. Project Manager Key Fire Protection, Inc. (731) 424-0130 office (731) 424-9285 fax (731) 267-4853 cell www.keyfireprotection.com -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Huggins Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 9:59 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: What's wrong with this? There's also a nice drawing portraying it in the Handbook. An additionally problem is that you would be likely exceeding your system maximum since you have now combined your two systems. Despite the fact that we use to do that for hose connections but that was explicitly allowed and had a different function. Roland On Feb 1, 2012, at 3:55 AM, Bobby Gillett wrote: > NFPA 13 2010 - 8.16.1.6 , 8.16.1.6.1, 8.16.1.6.2, 8.16.1.6.3 > > Bobby Gillett > Sr. Project Manager _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2109/4779 - Release Date: 02/01/12 _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
