The thing with "equivalency" is that you're supposed to prove it, not just say "by proclamation of thyself, the holder of the sacred rubber stamp, I declare this equal".
(just pokin' fun there, don't be hatin') Craig L. Prahl, CET Fire Protection CH2MHILL Lockwood Greene 1500 International Drive Spartanburg, SC 29304-0491 Direct - 864.599.4102 Fax - 864.599.8439 CH2MHILL Extension 74102 [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 6:14 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Underground Stub-Up - The Monkey Wrench 2 u Gentlemen: hey, Roland - what's that about "ugly orange suit"?? I had one back in the 70's - No, not that kind ('Disco' days...) Do we attain any "relief" using the old standby: "Equivalency - Nothing in this standard is intended to prevent the use of systems, methods, or devices..." ? Sealed by PE/FPE? Just my two-sense. "Disco" Jerry [email protected] (800) 503.1961 nationwide Jerry D. Watts, SFPE President & Co-Founder ACCENT FIRE ENGINEERING INT'L. Ltd. Santa Fe, New Mexico USA _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
