I've seen the AHJ require a wet system (run between bottom of truss and drop 
ceiling) for ceiling sprinklers and a dry system in attic. 

That may be what he was trying to require. 

Travis Mack, SET
MFP Design, LLC

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 21, 2014, at 8:26 AM, Steve Mackinnon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This is exactly the situation. I have combustible construction (attic) and 
> office space below the hung ceiling. Due to the attic space not being heated, 
> I'm forced to protect the building with a dry system. 
> 
> Thanks for the input guys! I thought I was missing something in the standard. 
> 
> Steven MacKinnon
> Fire Protection Division
> Hartcorn Plumbing and Heating, Inc.
> 850 South Second Street
> Ronkonkoma, NY 11779
> Office 631-580-2300  Fax - 631-580-1090
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cahill, 
> Christopher
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 10:23 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: no dry type sprinkler systems allowed in light hazard 
> applications
> 
> There is an annex section discouraging dry in warm rooms.  Now I'd bet very 
> few areas are cold and light hazard. Well except attics.  Ask how one does an 
> attic. I wonder if they are linking cold is not light usually.  It's annex so 
> don't think I'm agreeing just thinking of something out of the box.
> 
> 
> Chris Cahill
> Fire Protection Engineer
> Burns & McDonnell
> 952-656-3652
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> -------- Original message --------
> From: "Reed A. Roisum, C.E.T."
> Date:02/21/2014 10:11 AM (GMT-05:00)
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: no dry type sprinkler systems allowed in light hazard 
> applications
> 
> Better ask the AHJ for chapter and verse on that one cuz I'm pretty sure that 
> is not in there.
> 
> Reed A. Roisum, C.E.T. | Karges-Faulconbridge, Inc. | Fire Protection 
> Designer | Fargo, ND | direct: 701.552.9903 | mobile: 701.388.1352 | 
> http://www.kfiengineers.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve 
> Mackinnon
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 9:06 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: no dry type sprinkler systems allowed in light hazard applications
> 
> Good morning all,
> 
> I have a Local AHJ that is saying in NFPA 13, 2007 edition it states that dry 
> systems are not allowed in light hazard applications, does anyone have an 
> idea of where this is located?? I've looked through the standard a few times 
> and can't put my finger on anything close.
> 
> Thanks in advance
> 
> Steven
> 
> Steven MacKinnon
> Fire Protection Division
> Hartcorn Plumbing and Heating, Inc.
> 850 South Second Street
> Ronkonkoma, NY 11779
> Office 631-580-2300  Fax - 631-580-1090
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to