We've had an issue come up relating to PIV tampering.  We use a state adopted 
(Indiana) code that is based almost entirely on IBC/IFC 2006.  We've been asked 
to tamper PIVs per IBC/IFC.  Our site includes a large campus fire main loop 
and there is some discussion about whether or not all those valves require 
tampering.  My contention is that the campus fire main is a private fire 
service main and is outside the scope of IBC and the chapter 9 requirement to 
tamper all valves, IFC chapter 5 seems to be the correct code to apply and 
refers almost exclusively to NFPA 24 for private fire service mains.  NFPA 
allows locking and periodic checks rather than requiring electronic monitoring 
as IBC/IFC chapter 9 does.  Is there any succinct way to show the campus loop 
is out of the scope of IBC, or is my reasoning incorrect?

Mike Morey, CFPS, SET
Planner Scheduler/Designer
BMWC Constructors, Inc.
1740 W. Michigan St, Indianapolis, IN 46222
O: 317.651.0596 | C: 317.586.8111
[email protected]<https://owa.bmwc.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=hEc2LsZXLUqfB3v1fAsIUDtQSkfsw9AIUxDXhx81O08DpGEK3NHRaSbWuncnZEk-mLpe2vYiBJY.&URL=mailto%3amanta%40bmwc.com>
 | 
www.bmwc.com<https://owa.bmwc.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=hEc2LsZXLUqfB3v1fAsIUDtQSkfsw9AIUxDXhx81O08DpGEK3NHRaSbWuncnZEk-mLpe2vYiBJY.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.bmwc.com%2f>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to