Building Code says that Class II floor finish can be used in a fully 
sprinklered building, including within occupancies that require Class I 
otherwise.   I agree that this isn't a profound hazard; what potential sources 
of ignition will be present in the normal use and occupancy of this facility?  
Would such potential heat and/or ignition points sustain heat long enough to 
compromise the non-flammable turf layer and involve the rubber dust?

We're currently designing sprinklers in a warehouse that is accessory to a tire 
manufacturing plant, so I just looked at Chapter 15 earlier this week.  The 
client is storing palletized raw rubber blocks and finished treads and 
harvested rubber waste in tiny pebble and granular form, stored in 4' high 
sacks, single course on pallets.  So for the rubber waste we go to the decision 
tree in Chapter 15 to find that less than 5' in height doesn't even register.   
 Here, you have what - less than an inch of this stuff?    Your concerns are 
very well-placed but don't overthink it.  I'd be more concerned about the 
allegedly carcinogenic properties of rubber dust.

Steve L.



-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of å... ....
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 8:42 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Indoor Soccer Facility and combustible flooring

Generally, very generally speaking,  if the floor is involved and
contributing significantly to a fire, there are real problems.    That does
not mean, by most means, that floors do contribute significantly to
fires.   Floors usually do not contribute significantly to fires, even with
combustible material.

Years back (15 years), I remember NFPA 101 was considering relaxing their flame 
spread rating on flooring in exits, because floor material is usually so 
inconsequential, to a fast growing fire.​  NPFA 101 may well have relaxed their 
requirements;  I didn't follow up on the results.  There was reason for this 
consideration on relaxing the prescriptive performance of flooring.  By the 
time the floor became significantly involved, the fire has usually already 
defeated whatever suppression system was supposed to control it.  By the time 
flooring significantly contributes to most non-arson fires, the other 
combustibles are already well off and their pyrolysis is pushing the fire in 
the direction of flashover.

Flashover is not a real risky proposition on a very large open space such as a 
soccer/football pitch with few combustibles at elevated levels above the floor.

My overall consideration of this seemingly hazardous situation, is that it
is not as hazardous as your fears imagine it to be.   Sure, if someone
comes in and pours gasoline on a large area of the ground up tire inlay,
there could be a large initial fire.   But if you believe at full occupant
load that evacuation can reasonably occur in 4 minutes (or well before a 
hazardous layer envelopes building occupants), then I would sleep sound at 
night with the 0.2/1,500 sprinkler system you have described for this situaiton.

Yes, this decision is accepting a risk.  The Dutch accept (and have the courage 
to publish the acceptance) of killing ~1,500 people by sea levee failure, with 
the likelihood estimated in the 1 in 40,000 range.  Short of a arson situation, 
I think the risk of death by fire-in-tiny-spheres of ground-tire to be 
significantly less than this risk accepted by the Dutch, both in terms of 
likelihood of occurrence and in terms of final death
count.    The Dutch are, in my opinion, world-class leaders in risk
acceptance and likelihood estimation.

If you are looking for some peace-of-mind, ask for two samples of the
flooring.   Burn the samples in a worse-case scenario (corner
configuration).  You will have trouble igniting the rubber spheres.
Sprinkle gingerly with gasoline and attempt re-ignition.  Remember though that 
small scale tests do NOT duplicate real-scale fires.  Small-scale fires often 
underestimate the fire growth rate and size.

My apologies for a brusque treatment of a sensitive subject (fire deaths), but 
this is where the rubber meets the road.


Scot Deal
Excelsior Risk/Fire Engineering
gsm:  +33 (0) 64.96.67.44.46



Chris Ellsworth
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 10:03 AM
Subject: Indoor Soccer Facility

We were contracted to do a few add/relocates on an existing concrete tee 
construction facility.  A flag was thrown up once we found out what was being 
installed for this tenants flooring.  They are using an astro turf type field.  
The problem isn't with the turf itself.  It has undergone extensive testing to 
prove that it is not flammable.  The problem is with the inlay.  They have used 
the type of inlay you would see on an outdoor facility which is ground up 
tires.  I have checked with the plant manager who supplied their product and 
they do not use any type of a fire proofing spray on the product.  Essentially 
it is ground up tires.  We have a deck height of approximately 16 feet and it 
is double tee concrete construction.
The fire marshal and my concern is that the existing sprinkler system can not 
handle this type of fire.  I have already calced it and the best the system 
could do is a .2/1500.  This gives a 13 lb safety.  Has anybody dealt with 
anything close to this on an indoor facility and should we be concerned with 
this inlay?  Thanks in advance.







_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org



--
Amo a los que puede sonreír a sus problemas, que puede tomar fuerzas de sus 
angustias, y crecer valiente entre reflejo. Es el negocio de las mentes 
pequeñas a disminuir, pero cuyo corazón está firme, y cuya conciencia aprueba 
su conducta, continuarán sus principios hasta la muerte  - da vinci

Scot Deal
MSc Fire Protection Engineer/BSc Chemical Engineering Chartered Engineer EU 
Schengen Chartered Chemical Engineer, Engineers Australia Licensed Fire 
Protection Engineer, Oman FPE/PE USA
gsm:  +00 33 (0)649 667 446
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to