Greg,

If I were doing the design, I would use the 6-12 criteria. I believe that the 
additional water requirement is due to the delay in activation due to the 
increased deflector distance (or so I was told). I think you would have the 
same situation in that case.

For #2, the section in 13 requires that the "hydraulically most remote 4 
sprinklers" be calculated. I would make sure your design meets that criteria.

Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
www.fpdc.com
860-535-2080 (ofc)

> On Dec 22, 2014, at 8:12 PM, Greg McGahan <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Help please....
> 
> Situation in a NFPA 13 hotel...:
> 
> There is a 1'-0" wide soffit by 4" deep  adjacent to a restroom wall. If I
> place  res sidewall 4" under soffit the deflector would then be 8" below
> the higher ceiling past the 1'-0" soffit.
> 
> Although I am very conservative with calcs in general - this one hurts the
> pipe sizes bigtime so I am asking if my conservative approach is
> technically correct or overkill:
> 
> Question #1 - Do I have to calculate the head for the 6"-12" distance below
> the ceiling or can I use the 4"-6" range?
> 
> 
> Question #2 - When you do a 4 head Res calc in a 13 building, do you define
> "adjacent" by linear distance or do you purposely go for the sidewall in
> the next room even if it is further away in order to be conservative? IW -
> the nearest pendent in the next room is 4' away, going the other direction,
> the sidewall in the next room is 10' away.V's are sidewalls and + are
> pendents....thats as close as I can get at this hour.
> 
>     I          I           I         V                      I
>            V
>     I          I           I                                 I
>     I    +    I     +    I          +                     I
>           +
>     I          I           I                                 I
> 
> 
> Greg McGahan
> Living Water Fire Protection, LLC <http://www.livingwaterfp.com>
> 1160 McKenzie Road
> Cantonment, FL 32533
> 850-937-1850
> fax 850-937-1852
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to