A terrible fire but blessing no one was hurt.

They had another fire a few weeks before contained by sprinklers in a different 
section of the business park: 
http://www.whas11.com/story/news/local/2015/03/19/crews-working-fire-at-ge-appliances/25054443/

Ironic the tenant, Derby Industries, makes mattress specifically for fire houses



-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Brad Casterline
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 10:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: GE fire

Derby Industries:

http://www.derbyindustries.com/ecommerce/products.cfm?item=Corrections-Jail-
Mattresses-c84

>From Maurice:

"It appears from a 2012 report that the site (and particular building) was 
sprinkler protected, however there were recommendations to improve the 
protection arrangement and the arrangement of the water supply".

If I had to guess, I would say the stored commodity was other than originally 
designed for!!!

Brad 

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Jack Cahit Kilavuz
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 8:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: GE fire

FM brought the plastics in construction issue many years ago, developed a 
corner test, showed sprinklers designed for occupany may not be adequate for 
foam insuated buildings.
The building in the pictures appear very similar to meatworks, bakery and dairy 
buildings I visited the "day after", hence if the sprinklers are only based on 
NFPA basic manufacturing activity they may not be able to contain such a fire.

Of course this is after all previous comments: that the sprinkler should be 
adequate for occupancy, should be properly fitted and professionally maintained 
and provided with adequate/reliable water supply.

Jack
+973 33468488

On 6 April 2015 at 15:36, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Obviously something wasn't up to par.  One picture taken by an 
> employee before exiting showed a pretty significant fire in its early 
> stage but no sprinkler discharge.
>
> I've dealt with projects where there were sprinklers present but 
> either the system was impaired or incorrectly designed for the 
> occupancy such
that
> the fire resulted in a total loss of property.
>
> So just because there are sprinklers hanging from the steel doesn't 
> mean the building is actually sprinklered.
>
>
>
> Craig L. Prahl
> Fire Protection Group Lead
> CH2MHILL
> Lockwood Greene
> 1500 International Drive
> Spartanburg, SC  29303
> Direct - 864.599.4102
> Fax - 864.599.8439
> CH2MHILL Extension  74102
> [email protected]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Maurice 
> Marvi
> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 8:23 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: re: GE fire
>
> I had a chance to look up this location.
> It appears from a 2012 report that the site (and particular building) 
> was sprinkler protected, however there were recommendations to improve 
> the protection arrangement and the arrangement of the water supply.
>
> ----------------------------------------
> From: "Karen Lesko"
> Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2015 4:12 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: GE fire
>
> I have read several reports about the GE Warehouse fire and none of 
> them have mentioned if the warehouse was sprinklered.  Have any of you 
> seen
that
> info?
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to