What about treating it as exposure protection?
Todd G Williams, PE Fire Protection Design/Consulting Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc) 860-608-4559 (cell)
Sent using CloudMagic
[https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=pi&cv=6.0.64&pv=8.2]
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 9:45 PM, [email protected]
<[email protected]> wrote:
I have seen as an alternative do to practical difficulty a fire (& smoke?)
shutter, activated by link, fixed heat detector on outboard side, smoke
detector
on inboard side. Backup was head very close on inboard side. All monitored
off
site.
Target.
Building otherwise fully sprinklered.
Best
> On Dec 11, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Tony Eggster <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> This was more or less just a hypothetical question for me. I had seen a
> compactor recently that was not sprinkled and I was musing how you would
> even get a sprinkler out there in this case since it did not look like
> there was any space to do this from the inside. I was more interested in
> hearing your methods, so you guys really run a separate little dry
system
> for a single head? Out in my neck of the woods the AHJ's still permit
> antifreeze.
>
> Concerning the word 'sprinkled' - you understood what I said right?
Common
> usage and academic language ain't the same thang. :-)
>
> Tony
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
