This is just my 2 cents worth (in Canadian funds), but this is what NFPA 
14-2013 says on the subject:

5.6.4*   A test connection for testing the waterflow device shall be provided.

A.5.6.4   It is acceptable to utilize a hose valve on the standpipe to test the 
waterflow device as long as the water is dispersed to an acceptable location. 
This could be done with a hose valve on the roof or by using a hose connected 
to a hose valve discharging to a suitable location.

So, my reading of this is "a hose ...  discharging to a suitable location". It 
doesn't say "fire hose", so I think a garden hose should suffice.

Pete Schwab's substantiation when he proposed the new A.5.6.4 text was that "It 
should be allowed to use hose valves versus installing a test connection to 
test the waterflow device."

Best regards,

Larry Keeping

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Versoi, Michael
Sent: August-02-16 6:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: High Rise Standpipe

The specific information regarding the systems was passed along via a phone 
conversation. I assumed the Standpipe(s) in question were Class III, and posed 
the question as such, but was told they were Class II. There could be 
misinformation provided or interpreted. The question is still the same. Is 
Quarterly/Annual waterflow testing through a garden hose to activate the device 
an acceptable means for Class II system or must the Hand Hose station be 
utilized?
Any input would be appreciated.


Best regards,

Michael Versoi
Fire Sprinkler General Foreman
NICET III

Siemens Industry, Inc.
Building Technologies
22010 SE 51st Street
Issaquah, WA 98029
425.507.4300  Office
1.866.674.2728 Fax
425.281.7313  Mobile
24 hr Dispatch: 800-952-6348


This message and any attachments are solely for the use of intended recipients. 
The information contained herein may include trade secrets, protected health or 
personal information, privileged or otherwise confidential information. 
Unauthorized review, forwarding, printing, copying, distributing, or using such 
information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not an 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you received this email in 
error, and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
email and any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
email in error, please contact the sender and delete the message and any 
attachment from your system. Thank you for your cooperation
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to