Thank you Roland for your response and some background on the topic.

Zach

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Roland Huggins <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Both.  WE submitted this after trying to convince an AHJ that with a heat
> pump (aka low temp air), there was no need for separation.  It was
> initiated by the discharge diffuser but the duct itself will not be
> radiating a higher temperature so the allowance applies overall.
>
> Apply the NFPA caveat required for committee members when writing their
> own opinions, not a formal interpretation of the NFPA or any of its
> technical committees.
>
> Roland
>
>
> Roland Huggins, PE - Senior VP Engineering
>
> American Fire Sprinkler Assn.
>
> Dallas, TX
>
> http://www.firesprinkler.org
>
>
> Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives
>
>
>
>
> On May 31, 2017, at 5:27 AM, Zachary Siegrist <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> I have a job where the heads ( ordinary temp) are less than 1 ft 0 in from
> the edge of a downward discharge diffuser throughout the space.  The
> contractor has supplied me letter from the HVAC company stating that the
> air discharged out of the diffusers are less than 100F and therefore the
> heads do not need to be switched out or relocated to meet the specified
> distances in Table 8.3.2.5(a).  I believe he is trying to use Item 9
> under 8.3.2.5 stating “*ordinary temperature sprinklers located adjacent
> to a heating duct that discharges air that is less than 100F are not
> required to be separated in accordance with Table 8.3.2.5(a)*.”
>
>
> My question is this:  a diffuser is listed under the heating duct
> category in the ‘type of heat condition’ column in Table 8.3.2.5 (a).
> Are diffusers viewed differently than the ductwork itself?  Any thoughts
> as to if the previously referenced section applies to sprinklers located
> adjacent to diffusers or just sprinklers located adjacent to heating
> ducts?   Typically heads are just switched out to intermediate temperature
> sprinklers but this is the first time someone has taken this approach.
>
> Zach
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
> org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
> org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to