Great information. I really appreciate the time it must have taken to gather
this information. Thank you!

John Irwin
DynaFire Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
On Behalf Of Hinson, Ryan
Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 12:53 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: fixed site industrial hose monitor

Right-o on what's being protected.  Is NFPA 400 applicable in this
jurisdiction?  If so, fertilizer (ammonium nitrate per Section 11.1.2 of the
2013 edition) and the protection thereof are required in accordance with
Section 6.2.1.1 as required by Section 11.2.6.  Section 6.2.1.1 requires all
four high-hazard protection levels to include an approved automatic
sprinkler system complying with Section 13.3 of NFPA 1 (2018).  NFPA 400
Section 6.2.1.1.1 requires a minimum OH2 sprinkler system.  Is the building
sprinklered off which this loading dock extends?  What is the total weight
of stored bagged fertilizer?  More than 2500 tons requires sprinkler
protection or special AHJ-approval per NFPA 400 Section 11.2.6.1.1.1.  The
AHJ is given authority to determine whether greater quantities can be stored
without sprinkler protection if consideration is given to proximity of
storage to congested areas, and the presence of contaminants where a special
hazard is deemed present per Sections 11.2.6.1.2 and 11.2.6.1.3.  Section
11.2.6.2.1 requires portable extinguishers throughout the storage, loading,
and unloading areas per NFPA 10.   Section 11.2.6.2.2 allows small hose
systems in accordance with NFPA 14.  Fire hydrants and water supplies are to
be in accordance with the adopted fire code and as required by the AHJ per
Section 11.2.6.3.  If the area where the facility is located is considered
remote, it is within the AHJ's purview to waive sprinkler or even hydrant
requirements per Section 11.2.6.4.

Is it possible that the fixed monitors are the AHJ's corrosion reducing
alternative (or special) protection equivalent for this hazard as inferred
in NFPA 24 (2016) Section 9.2?  If so, it is my opinion that they should
provide you with a written document directive outlining what they will
allow.

Regarding monitor protection, typical fixed monitor sprays exceeding 250 gpm
are the minimum threshold for masterstream nozzles allowing either
straight-stream for maximum reach or wide-fog stream for large area
wetting/cooling in accordance with NFPA 24 Section 9.1.  Was any direction
given regarding automatic monitor activation?  What about local vs. remote
manual activation?  Is the intent for the monitors to be able to throw
through the loading dock doors?  If so, how far?  How will prevailing winds
affect the selected nozzle flow-based throw pattern?  Based on the info
provided, you will likely need at least 500 gpm to operate both monitors
simultaneously.  What type of pressure is available for monitor operation?
Typical monitor nozzle design points are residual pressures of 100 psi at
the base of the nozzle with some low-pressure models operable down to 75
psi.  Typical minimum setbacks from protected equipment or areas for local
manually-operated monitors in petrochemical settings are 50 ft to keep
exposure heat-flux to the operator below certain thresholds.  This may be
different for your application.  Duration of flow may be equivalent to that
of hose stream durations or longer...or it may be limited to their engine
response time.  Is UL listing or FM approval going to be required on the
components you select?

You need several answers before you can complete this design.

Ryan L. Hinson, PE*, SET**  \  Burns & McDonnell Senior Fire Protection
Engineer O 952-656-3662 \  M 320-250-5404  \  F 952-229-2923
rhin...@burnsmcd.com  \  burnsmcd.com
8201 Norman Center Drive, Suite 300  \  Bloomington, MN 55437 *Registered
in: LA, MD, MN, PA, TX, & UT **NICET IV - Water-Based Systems Layout

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
On Behalf Of John Irwin
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2018 8:27 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: fixed site industrial hose monitor

Here’s something new to me …



We have an AHJ asking us to install 2 new, fixed hose cannons at  loading
dock doors at a fertilizer plant. That’s the extent of the direction we were
given.



So naturally I have to justify this with code to support its requirement,
and to verify that it’s done properly.



Can someone provide direction on which path I even begin on. Where should I
look for proper spacing, calculation procedures. heck is there even a
requirement (I assume this will lead to knowing what’s being protected … )





Any leads are greatly appreciated.





John Irwin

Fire Sprinkler Specialist

DynaFire, Inc.

727-282-9243 – Cell



*“A customer is the most important visitor on our premises. He is not
dependent on us. We are dependent on him. He is not an interruption on our
work. He is the purpose of it. He is not an outsider on our business. He is
a part of it. We are not doing him a favour by serving him. He is doing us a
favour by giving us an opportunity to do so.”*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.firesprinkler.org_private.cgi_sprinklerforum-2Dfiresprinkler.org_attachments_20180301_910a38b7_attachment.html&d=DwIGaQ&c=pgTKN5yjcEYSPUPpeP-zuA&r=NcyRL-K75Is7l5iUo7UtKsal2WbPG4sAR-BrZExi8dA&m=sIaqidqazefr08QoEJS6T7Ky5hHy_23dvecmgspK2nk&s=xx3eF1NpjYriJkHoO5iUe6WIeCbkizrzDVOjmiqMyck&e=>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.firesprinkler.org_listinfo.cgi_sprinklerforum-2Dfiresprinkler.org&d=DwIGaQ&c=pgTKN5yjcEYSPUPpeP-zuA&r=NcyRL-K75Is7l5iUo7UtKsal2WbPG4sAR-BrZExi8dA&m=sIaqidqazefr08QoEJS6T7Ky5hHy_23dvecmgspK2nk&s=wt0T8sdBZKTMtLG2f_1DnioWX_jsLGLZ0hKLZrf6DHU&e=
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to