Another argument against apart from common sense suggests they won't work is how costly it will be to do the five year testing on dry barrel sidewalls. Of course, you guys don't have that problem, but for the rest of us, rational minded AHJs will take that argument into account (or have in my experience a couple of times). Then there are the other types...
Ron Greenman [email protected] 253.576.9700 The Universe is monstrously indifferent to the presence of man. -Werner Herzog, screenwriter, film director, author, actor and opera director (1942-) On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Steve Leyton <[email protected]> wrote: > City of SD? LOL, we’re having that go-round on another project right now … > > > > Sorry, don’t have a better answer than, “Common sense and the properties > of convection suggest that installing sprinklers that high on the exterior > of a building entails a very low chance of successful cause and effect.” > > > > Steve L. > > > > *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]. > org] *On Behalf Of *Jerry Van Kolken > *Sent:* Monday, April 16, 2018 11:11 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Height of overhanging Eaves/canopies > > > > Is there code addressing the height of exterior eave and providing > protection underneath. I have a couple of buildings where the FM is > requiring protection in the exterior eaves. Some of these eaves are over > the ground level at the 5th floor level. I also had another project > where the question was asked about an projection on a 12th roof level. > > > > Jerry Van Kolken > > *Millennium Fire Protection Corp.* > > 2950 San Luis Rey Rd. > > Oceanside, CA 92058 > > (760) 722-2722 FX 722-2730 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler. > org > >
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
