As Matt said. You won’t find anything to back your position because link vs bulb is not addressed. It simply says to match response. Educate the inspector.
Travis Mack, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G, SET 480-505-9271 MFP Design, LLC www.mfpdesign,com Send large files to MFP Design via: https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign Sent from my iPhone > On May 20, 2019, at 7:42 AM, Matthew J Willis <[email protected]> wrote: > > NFPA makes no distinction as to how the response is achieved. > > Only that it meet the tables. > > However, if it is a food or healthcare type facility, there may be > extenuating circumstances.. > > R/ > Matt > > > Matthew J. Willis, CWBSP > Design Manager /3-D Specialist > Rapid Fire Protection Inc. > 1530 Samco Road > Rapid City, SD 57702 > Office-605.348.2342 > Direct Line-605.593.5063 > Cell-605.391.2733 > Fax:-605.348.0108 > > <image001.png> > > From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On > Behalf Of John Irwin > Sent: Monday, May 20, 2019 8:38 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Bulb type vs link type sprinklers > > We have completed a relocate project and the fire inspector says that we need > to match link type sprinklers with the existing link type sprinklers. We > installed standard response GBs to match the standard response link type that > are currently installed. Is there any documentation to support my belief that > this should be acceptable? > > > > John Irwin > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
