With stakeholder voting, your PE seal and signature would not be released until enough parties authorize. We could write the contract agreements for payment straight into the blockchain instance which also can record the who, what, where, and WHY regarding the sign-&-seal deal. The contract could be written so seal and signature had a green light, but were not released until proof-of-stake confirmed and payment franked.
Yes, presently people can copy our electronic seal with current capture technology, however with blockchain tech, the sign and seal could come with a code printed next to it, telling the reader where to go on the blockchain to review the statistics of that transaction. Blockchains can be written so they are highly tamper resistant, yet publicly transparent for viewing...which is the whole-idea... More importantly, our medical records could be thrown up onto a MEDICAL blockchain. Much or all of our data (depending on how much individuals want to release) could be put on this MEDICAL blockchain, the advantages for me are... I don't need another chest X-ray each time I work in a new country. Just access the viable data on the MEDICAL blockchain, and voila! Of course, there is a lot of money to be lost by administrators whom are paid to make, take and not share our medical data. In fact, holding onto turf and work flows is why I am less and less worried about AI overtaking white collar jobs... How are we going to program the robots to perform white collar corruption ...or is that the next whole-idea, too? Scot Deal gms: +965 6676 9514 gms: +420 606 872 129 On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 12:56 PM Spencer Tomlinson <[email protected]> wrote: > I like the blockchain idea – and all ideas involving securing documents > that utilize an electronic seal (as most states seem to require in their > statutes). That being said, even with a wet seal or secured document > utilizing electronic seal, there are issues. My wife introduced me to the > “snipping tool” in Microsoft – it will easily make a copy of anything you > can see on your screen – and that is easily pasted right back into any type > of document. Great for modifying/creating plans, but also a great tool for > a potential scammer. So, a scanned in wet seal and/or secured document can > still easily become a route for someone to use your stamp/seal if they have > the guts to do so, whether via the snipping tool or via Blubeam, etc…. > > > > *Spencer Tomlinson* > > Principal, PE > > > > [image: red logo] > > Ph: 316-202-6412 > > Fax: 316-202-2346 > > Cell: 620-955-7293 > > www.tomlinsonfire.com > > > > *From:* Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> *On > Behalf Of *å... .... via Sprinklerforum > *Sent:* Friday, March 6, 2020 5:29 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Cc:* å... .... <[email protected]> > *Subject:* electronic PE stamps > > > > > > There should be a blockchain for professional seal-and-signatures... > including doctors and lawyers. > > Accountants already nailed this security issue, as they are closer to big > money with some items they sign. > > > > To use such a proposed blockchain, all parties involved in using the > signature need vote their consent, including the obvious seal-holder and > the requester. > > In this way, . > > the public could see whose name was on which abominable judgments or > laudable achievements, > > the AHJs would know right away if the signer was validly involved, > and active, > > the signer would get paid, as the signature could be pre-approved, > but not released until funds move, > > the funds attached to the signature should also be made public. > > > > In such a system, we would not have rogue sign-and-seal applications > sprayed throughout the land (as this does happen). > > If anyone try to tamper with this blockchain, it could be flagged and > noted. Anyone investigating information could be appended to the file. > > In this proposed application, increased transparency would be a good thing > to bring and is overdue in my view. > > > > > > Scot Deal > > Excelsior Risk & Fire > > gms: +965 6676 9514 > > gms: +420 606 872 129 > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 12:15 PM Matt Grise via Sprinklerforum < > [email protected]> wrote: > > for all of the PE's out there (or otherwise certified folks who stamp > things): > > > > do you use electronic stamps/seals on the documents you produce? The areas > I work in accept electronic stamps, but I have stayed with wet stamps and > signing by hand due to security concerns. I feel like I am ready to move in > to the future! (or maybe into the not-to-recent past?) > > > > for electronic seals - what kind of measures do you take for security? do > you have any concerns about usable electronic copies of your stamp being > out there? > > > > Any thoughts or suggestions would be very welcome! > > > > Thanks! > > > > Matt > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > >
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
